Intend to enhance this concern? Update the inquiry so it'' s on-topic for Language & Use Heap Exchange.

Shut 8 years back.

When you discuss "shrimp" in the plural, there"s no "s."Nevertheless, just how can you clarify it grammatically?


Some words might be either single, plural, or vast, relying on exactly how they are utilized in a specific context. That"s simply the method it is. There"s truly no grammatic description to it, although for some words, there might be historic descriptions behind just how their plurals are formed.I ought to keep in mind,

nevertheless, that "shrimp" is in fact among those words where the plural type might be "shrimp" or "shrimps", relying on the audio speaker"s language.

shrimp (vast as well as countable, pluralshrimp or shrimps)

—-- resource: Wiktionary

Boost this response
Adhere to
addressed Oct 16 "13 at 2:10
* 7,37122 gold badges3030 silver badges5050 bronze badges
|Program 5 extra remarks
In we have mass nouns such as timber or rice. You can not count a mass noun by placing a number before it (2 publications) or pluralize it by including an -s (lights). To show amount you compose the device of procedure before the mass noun. As an example, you would certainly create "2 cables of timber" or "10 feet of timber" or "2 extra pounds of rice".

It appears the grammatic factors for this are unknown. I"ve review numerous descriptions of exactly how it is however none that explicity offer the reason it is so. I discovered the adhering to online at

Exists a theoretical basis to the grammatic difference in between matter nouns as well as mass nouns? One response is that this grammatic difference is, to a large level, unprincipled as well as semantically nontransparent. Generally, individuals discover which nouns are commonly utilized as matter nouns as well as which are usually made use of as mass nouns with no understanding of why these distinctions in phrase structure take place. One more response is that the grammatic difference in between matter as well as mass nouns is to a huge level conceptually based. That is, when audio speakers make use of matter nouns to describe points they unconditionally have something in mind that they are attempting to interact that prevails throughout all uses matter nouns. A comparable sight puts on using mass nouns. A 3rd response, as well as the one that I recommend, is that the count-mass noun difference is to a large level conceptually based, yet there are exemptions. Some exemptions do not appear to have a clear description, yet others might happen as a result of contending communicative features of language.Here "s Wikipedia"s take:

In (as well as in several various other languages), there is a propensity for nouns describing fluids (water, juice), powders (sugar, sand), or compounds (steel, timber) to be made use of in mass phrase structure, and also for nouns describing individuals or things to be matter nouns. This is not an unalterable regulation; nevertheless, mass nouns such as furnishings as well as flatware, which stand for even more conveniently measured things, reveal that the mass/count difference need to be taken a building of the terms themselves, instead of as a residential property of their referents. As an example, the exact same collection of chairs can be described as "7 chairs" and also as "furnishings"; although both chair as well as furnishings are describing the very same point, the previous is a matter noun and also the last a mass noun. The Center mass noun pease has actually come to be the matter noun pea by morphological reanalysis.

For an additional image of the concept that the count/non-count difference exists not in an item yet instead in the expression that describes it, think about the words "fruit" and also "veggies". The things that these words define are, fairly talking, comparable (that is, they"re all edible plant components); yet words "fruit" is (normally) non-count, whereas "veggies" is a plural matter type. One can see that the distinction remains in the language, not in the fact of the things. At the same time, German has a basic word for "veggies" that, like "fruit", is (typically) non-count: das Gemüse. British has a vernacular word for "veggies" that acts similarly: "veg" .

In languages that have a partitive situation, the difference is obligatory and also specific. As an example, in Finnish, sign up with vettä, "I consumed alcohol (some) water", words vesi, "water", remains in the partitive instance. The associated sentence sign up with veden, "I consumed alcohol (the) water", utilizing the accusative instance rather, thinks that there was a details countable section of water that was totally intoxicated.

The job of logicians like Godehard Web link and also Manfred Krifka developed that the mass/count difference can be offered a specific, mathematical interpretation in regards to quantization as well as cumulativity.